• À propos
    Qui nous sommesRépertoire du personnelConseil d'administrationMembres renommésPrix de membresPlan stratégique / Rapports annuelComités/CommunautésCode de déontologieFondation éducativeÉquité, diversité et inclusion
  • Défense des intérêts
    MémoiresPolitique d'intervention de l’IPIC
  • Qu'est-ce que la PI?
     Les bases de la PICampagne C'est à vous.Pourquoi utiliser un professionnelComment devenir un agentSavoirs traditionnels autochtones
  • Formation
    Programmes de certificationCours et événementsOutil de recherche des gestionnaires agréé canadien
  • Ressources
    NouvellesRevue canadienne de PITrouver un professionnel de la PIGuichet emplois de l'IPICEnquêtes de rémunération de l'IPICTrousse médiaInitiative Assistance PI
  • Adhésion
    Votre profession. Notre raison d’être.Devenez membreAvantages aux membresCatégories d'adhésionProgramme de recrutementProgramme d'assurance pour les agents de la PI
  • 0
  • EN
Francesco Tosto
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
,
Curtis Fawcett
Les sujets
Partagez

Protecting Confidential Information in the Remote Working Environment

Publié le 3 juin 2020

The restrictions on workplaces resulting from provincial emergency orders and the need to physically distance have created a myriad of challenges for employers. Chief among these challenges is setting up or operationalizing remote working for employees. One area that may be overlooked by employers is the security and protection of intellectual property, including trade secrets and confidential information.

What you need to know

Now that employees are working from home or other remote-access locations, they may require access to confidential company information. This creates a risk that confidential information may be released, shared, or otherwise dispersed. In the event that a company does not take proper precautions in respect of its confidential information, it may be limited in its ability to seek relief from the courts to protect its interests;

  • The legal framework surrounding confidential information, including what it is, and how it can be protected; and
  • Best practices for managing confidential information in this new mass remote-work environment.

Trade secrets and confidential information

Not all intellectual property will be protected by copyright or patents. Often, companies will treat information as confidential or as a trade secret. Broadly put, trade secrets are forms of information that are generally not publicly known and which give the owner of the secret a competitive or economic advantage over others who are unaware of the information. A company may opt for trade secret protection where there are potential patent registration issues or in an effort to maintain protection for a longer period than that afforded, under the Patent Act by example. Trade secrets are a particular type of confidential information, however, confidential information can include a broader scope of documents or knowledge. For example, confidential information that will support a breach of confidence claim may include customer lists, business plans or other data specific to a company’s operations that is not publicly known or otherwise obtainable.

It is critical to take steps to protect confidential information. Without taking precautions, not only might trade secrets and confidential information be released to the public, it may also become more difficult to enforce an action for breach of confidence in the event that information is released or misused by an employee or competitor. The test for bringing a claim of breach of confidence requires that the claimant show:

  • the information itself must have the necessary quality of confidence about it
  • information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence
  • there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it

In order to establish the above factors, trade secrets and confidential information must be handled in a manner that protects its confidentiality. A trade secret will become lost when it becomes generally known to the public. This concern is now further complicated when the workplace has shifted to remote access, and employees require the ability to access company information in ways that previously would have been confined to the office or job site.

Remote working and protecting company intellectual property
Now that employers are required to shift their employees and operations to deliver services remotely, it is important to review and consider what measures are in place to protect company intellectual property. General security measures that the courts may look at to determine whether information is confidential include:

  • security codes and password protection of company information
  • labelling of information as confidential, and storage in a secure area or place
  • limiting employee remote access to trade secrets and confidential information to certain key employees
  • terms in employment agreements in respect of confidentiality
  • confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with contractors

Now is a key time for companies to review and consider whether they currently have appropriate measures in place, and whether any in-place policies require revisions to address the challenges posed by remote work. It will also be prudent to consider updating or implementing policies concerning remote work, including:

  • ensuring that employees have access to secure electronic file storage
  • review or creation of a work-from-home policy that sets out or reiterates company policy in respect of confidential information, trade secrets and intellectual property generally
  • access requirements and permissions for certain employees or contractors
  • instructions on storing files and company records (i.e., not on unencrypted thumb drives or physical copies that are not secured)
  • utilizing systems that allow the monitoring of intellectual property, including tracking who has access to files and records, and whether information has been downloaded or transferred through other electronic means

In the event that a company or employer suspects that its trade secrets or confidential information have been improperly released or misused, it will be necessary to take swift action, including filing a Statement of Claim which seeks injunctive relief to prevent the use or further disclosure of the confidential information or trade secret.

Takeaway

The challenges facing companies in this new mass remote working environment may impact the security of confidential information. BLG has the experience and personnel to review any policies and company methods to ensure best practices, as well as effectively navigate the court system to enforce company rights in the event of a release or unauthorized use of intellectual property.

Articles connexes

14 février 2025

Nettoyer le placard : la Commission des oppositions des marques de commerce examine le registre

Michael Badejo
L’article 45 de la Loi sur les marques de commerce a généralement permis aux requérants et aux opposants d’enregistrements d’une marque de commerce d’éliminer le « bois mort », c.-à-d. des marques de commerce non employées et abandonnées qui figuraient au registre des marques de commerce. Ce processus était généralement réservé aux parties pour commencer une demande et surveiller l’état du registre. En décembre 2024, la Commission des oppositions des marques de commerce (COMC) a été informée d’un projet pilote qui permettrait à la COMC d’introduire des procédures en vertu de l’article 45. Son effet? La COMC peut supprimer du registre les éléments inutiles sans attendre que des requérants ou des opposants introduisent la procédure.
TopicsMarques
24 janvier 2025

Implications pratiques de la définition de la Cour fédérale des demandes de brevet divisionnaires « imposées » dans NCS Multistage

Émilie Fleury
Dans l’affaire NCS Multistage Inc. c. Kobold Corporation, 2023 CF 1486, la Cour fédérale s’est de nouveau penchée sur la question de ce qui constitue une « demande divisionnaire forcée »—une distinction importante, puisqu’une division forcée bénéficie d’une immunité contre les allégations de double brevet. Dans cet article, Émilie-Anne Fleury examine comment la Cour a déterminé si certains brevets divisionnaires étaient véritablement « forcés », clarifie la façon dont les divisions volontaires et forcées sont traitées en vertu du droit canadien des brevets, et met en lumière les considérations pratiques auxquelles les demandeurs de brevets font face lorsqu’ils doivent répondre à des objections relatives à l’unité de l’invention.
TopicsBrevets
17 janvier 2025

Dévoiler la toile : Faire face à la contrefaçon d’art autochtone au Canada

Melissa Tarsitano, AFSHAAN JIWAJI KAPASI
L’art a toujours constitué une expression profonde de la culture, de l’histoire et de l’identité. Au Canada, l’art autochtone témoigne de manière vibrante de l’héritage riche et des traditions diverses des peuples autochtones. Cependant, au sein de la célébration de cette richesse culturelle, un problème préoccupant émerge – la prévalence de la contrefaçon d’art autochtone. Afshaan Jiwaji Kapasi et Melissa Tarsitano explorent les complexités de la contrefaçon de l'art indigène et offrent des possibilités de sauvegarder et de célébrer authentiquement l'art indigène.
TopicsComité sur l'anti-contrefaçon Enjeux autochtones en matière

MISSION

Notre mission est d'améliorer l'expertise de nos membres en tant que conseillers en propriété intellectuelle de confiance et de façonner un environnement politique et commercial qui encourage le développement, l'utilisation et la valeur de la PI.


VISION

Notre vision est que l'IPIC soit la principale autorité en matière de propriété intellectuelle au Canada et la voix des professionnels de la propriété intellectuelle.

DERNIERS GAZOUILLIS

Twitter feed is currently not available

NOUS JOINDRE

360, rue Albert, bureau 550
Ottawa, ON K1R 7X7

T 613-234-0516
E admin@ipic.ca

RECONNAISSANCE DU TERRITOIRE

Le bureau de l’IPIC est situé à Ottawa, sur le territoire non cédé de la Nation algonquine Anishinabe.

© 2021 Institut de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada, Ottawa (Ontario)
Designed by Ottawa Web Design driven by Member Management Software