• About us
    Who We AreStaff DirectoryBoard of DirectorsHall of FameMember AwardsStrategic Plan / Annual ReportsCommittees/CommunitiesCode of EthicsEducational FoundationEquity, Diversity & Inclusion
  • Advocacy
    IP IncentivesIPIC SubmissionsIPIC Intervention Policy
  • What is IP?
     IP BasicsOwn it. CampaignWhy Use a ProfessionalHow to Become an AgentIndigenous Traditional Knowledge
  • Education
    Certification ProgramsCourses & EventsMentorship Program
  • Resources
    COVID-19 UpdatesNewsCIPRFind an IP ProfessionalIPIC Job Bank2019 Compensation StudyMedia KitIP Assist
  • Membership
    Your profession. Our purpose.Join NowMember BenefitsMember CategoriesMember Referral ProgramInsurance Program: IP Agent Insurance
  • College
    College UpdatesCollege FAQBackground
  • 0
  • FR
Reagan Seidler
Smart & Biggar LP
Topics
Share

Where will intellectual property fit into Elon’s Twitter?

Published on May 4, 2022

The promise of a new “free speech” era for Twitter has made some relieved, others peeved. With the news that Elon Musk intends to make the platform a “digital town hall,” both fans and critics anxiously await what form the new debate landscape will take.

However the rules of engagement are drafted, the boundaries of what speech is allowed will have some legal limits. Hate speech and defamation are easy examples – but one often overlooked and underappreciated boundary is intellectual property.

IP vs. Free Expression

IP rights are well-established as an intentional and reasonable limit on certain kinds of expression. For example, the right to express oneself will not include the right to use popular music without permission (copyright infringement), to modify a third party’s logo to launch a product (trademark infringement), to advertise services inaccurately (unfair competition), or to reveal confidential information of an employer (breach of confidence).

Copyright law prohibits unauthorized copying or distribution of a work. As such, free speech rights do not automatically permit copying, particularly if done for profit. This is balanced by “fair use” or “fair dealing” exceptions to copyright, which may permit use of copyrighted works for things such as research, criticism, review, parody and news reporting.

Trademark law prohibits third parties from appropriating brand names and symbols that belong to other people. While there is no “fair dealing” exception in trademark law, merely discussing a trademark is not considered “use” so would not normally be an infringement.

Competition laws prohibit a range of behaviour, including any false or misleading statements about one’s products or services or a competitor’s products or services.

Contract law requires parties to a contract of confidentiality, such as an employee or service provider, to maintain that confidentiality. Free speech will not normally protect someone from liability for breach of confidence, with the exception of certain whistleblower statutes.

How these IP rights should stack up against constitutional rights is a matter of debate.  Some Canadian courts have read down IP provisions so as to expand the scope of free speech for citizens (see British Columbia Automobile Assn v OPEIU, Local 378 (2001), 85 BCLR (3d) 302 (SC), where a striking union’s website parodying the employer was found not to depreciate the goodwill  the employer had in its registered trademark). Other courts have sided with rightsholders, finding expression rights do not include the ability to use someone else’s private property (see Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin v CAW Canada, [1997] 2 FC 306 (TD), where the union’s depiction of the “Michelin Man” stepping on workers was found to be infringing). Both of these decisions, it is worth noting, have been criticized for getting things wrong.

While interesting questions academically, the day-to-day content of Twitter debates are not likely to depend on a judge’s perspective. More often, it is the platform’s policy that will rule, with the right of interested parties to involve the courts if and when they believe Twitter’s platform policies do not comply with applicable laws.

Terms of Service

All major social media platforms have rules regarding infringement. This is in part a result of the Digital Millennial Copyright Act in the U.S., and to an extent, the Copyright Act in Canada, which have put obligations on intermediaries to act when notified that infringement is occurring.

Twitter is no exception. At present, its trademark and copyright infringement policy allows rightsholders to report misuse of their intellectual property, which can lead to takedowns and suspensions. Twitter currently requires trademark owners to have successfully registered their trademark before the platform will act on a complaint. A pending trademark application alone is not normally enough. However, a registration is not required to advance a copyright complaint, which can be supported with a link to the original work.

Of all potential changes, a shift in how Twitter polices IP rights may be among the most impactful as it concerns free speech. Critics have alleged in the past that some media companies are not well-equipped to discern between content that is infringing and that which is fair. If Twitter seeks to re-draw the line to favour greater expression, it may have significant impacts both on users and IP rights owners.

As the contours of New Twitter emerge in the coming weeks, both Elon’s fans and faultfinders would be wise to keep IP policies high on their watchlist.

Submitted by: Reagan Seidler, Vice-Chair, IPIC Communications Committee

 

Related Articles

December 16, 2022

Branding in the Metaverse: The Rise in NFT Trademark Applications and Best Practices to Protect your Brand

Melissa Tarsitano, Alessia Monastero
The Anti-Counterfeiting Committee is excited to bring to UnscrIPted a series of articles related to the evolving digital landscape, highlighting non-fungible tokens (NFTs), new mobile and web-based applications, branding in the metaverse and artificial intelligence. To read our last article in the series, which provided an introduction to NFTs and the counterfeit implications of the Metaverse, click here.
Topics
December 9, 2022

A Reflection on Nice Classification in 2022 and The Coming-Into Force of the 12th EditionA Reflection on Nice Classification in 2022 and The Coming-Into Force of the 12th Edition

Kimberley Baillie
At the 32nd Session of the Nice Committee of Experts it was confirmed that the 12th Edition of the Nice Classification will come into force this January 1, 2023. This new Edition reflects changes to the Nice Classification Headings, a few transfers with respect to goods, but does not contain any transfers with respect to services. Most notably “dispensers” have been transferred and will now be classified according to material composition.
Topics

MISSION

Our mission is to enhance our members’ expertise as trusted intellectual property advisors, and to shape a policy and business environment that encourages the development, use, and value of intellectual property.


VISION

Our vision is for IPIC to be the leading authority on intellectual property in Canada, and the voice of intellectual property professionals.

LATEST TWEETS

Intellectual Property Institute of Canada ∙ @IPIC_Canada: Thank you @gowlingwlg_ca for sharing! We look forward to having Jayde join us for #IPIC's TM Agent Exam Prep Course… https://t.co/iPuD1uZVbH5 days ago

Intellectual Property Institute of Canada ∙ @IPIC_Canada: #IPIC's TM Agent Exam Prep Course will be OFFERED ONLY ONCE before the 2023 #Trademark Agent Qualifying Examination… https://t.co/HTRFMopa4L5 days ago

Intellectual Property Institute of Canada ∙ @WIPO: When women enter the intellectual property universe, we accelerate innovation and creativity – and everyone’s a winner✨ The #Wor…6 days ago

Intellectual Property Institute of Canada ∙ @IPIC_Canada: Throughout February, #IPIC will honour Black History Month #BHM2023 with a series of IPIC Member Spotlights highlig… https://t.co/FYsZFPSQkH6 days ago

Intellectual Property Institute of Canada ∙ @IPIC_Canada: STARTS TODAY! Still time to register! #IPIC's Patent Agent Training Course-Infringement & Validity Module: an advan… https://t.co/phW7uiJq2k11 days ago

Intellectual Property Institute of Canada ∙ @IPIC_Canada: STARTS TOMORROW!! Don't miss out! #IPIC's Patent Agent Training Course-Infringement & Validity Module: an advanced… https://t.co/50426pSKWb12 days ago

CONTACT US

360 Albert Street, Suite 550
Ottawa, ON K1R 7X7

T 613-234-0516
E admin@ipic.ca

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The IPIC office is located in Ottawa, on the traditional, unceded territories of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.

©2021 Intellectual Property Institute of Canada, Ottawa, ON
Designed by Ottawa Web Designers driven by Member Management Software