• About us
    Who We AreStaff DirectoryBoard of DirectorsHall of FameMember AwardsStrategic Plan / Annual ReportsCommittees/CommunitiesCode of EthicsEducational FoundationEquity, Diversity & Inclusion
  • Advocacy
    IPIC SubmissionsIPIC Intervention Policy
  • What is IP?
     IP BasicsOwn it. CampaignWhy Use a ProfessionalHow to Become an AgentIndigenous Traditional Knowledge
  • Education
    Certification ProgramsCourses & EventsCertified Canadian Patent & Trademark Administrator Search Tool
  • Resources
    NewsCIPRFind an IP ProfessionalIPIC Job BankIPIC Compensation SurveysMedia KitIP Assist
  • Membership
    Your profession. Our purpose.Join NowMember BenefitsMember CategoriesMember Referral ProgramInsurance Program: IP Agent Insurance
  • 0
  • FR
Francesco Tosto
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
,
Curtis Fawcett
Topics
Share

Protecting Confidential Information in the Remote Working Environment

Published on June 3, 2020

The restrictions on workplaces resulting from provincial emergency orders and the need to physically distance have created a myriad of challenges for employers. Chief among these challenges is setting up or operationalizing remote working for employees. One area that may be overlooked by employers is the security and protection of intellectual property, including trade secrets and confidential information.

What you need to know

Now that employees are working from home or other remote-access locations, they may require access to confidential company information. This creates a risk that confidential information may be released, shared, or otherwise dispersed. In the event that a company does not take proper precautions in respect of its confidential information, it may be limited in its ability to seek relief from the courts to protect its interests;

  • The legal framework surrounding confidential information, including what it is, and how it can be protected; and
  • Best practices for managing confidential information in this new mass remote-work environment.

Trade secrets and confidential information

Not all intellectual property will be protected by copyright or patents. Often, companies will treat information as confidential or as a trade secret. Broadly put, trade secrets are forms of information that are generally not publicly known and which give the owner of the secret a competitive or economic advantage over others who are unaware of the information. A company may opt for trade secret protection where there are potential patent registration issues or in an effort to maintain protection for a longer period than that afforded, under the Patent Act by example. Trade secrets are a particular type of confidential information, however, confidential information can include a broader scope of documents or knowledge. For example, confidential information that will support a breach of confidence claim may include customer lists, business plans or other data specific to a company’s operations that is not publicly known or otherwise obtainable.

It is critical to take steps to protect confidential information. Without taking precautions, not only might trade secrets and confidential information be released to the public, it may also become more difficult to enforce an action for breach of confidence in the event that information is released or misused by an employee or competitor. The test for bringing a claim of breach of confidence requires that the claimant show:

  • the information itself must have the necessary quality of confidence about it
  • information must have been imparted in circumstances importing an obligation of confidence
  • there must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it

In order to establish the above factors, trade secrets and confidential information must be handled in a manner that protects its confidentiality. A trade secret will become lost when it becomes generally known to the public. This concern is now further complicated when the workplace has shifted to remote access, and employees require the ability to access company information in ways that previously would have been confined to the office or job site.

Remote working and protecting company intellectual property
Now that employers are required to shift their employees and operations to deliver services remotely, it is important to review and consider what measures are in place to protect company intellectual property. General security measures that the courts may look at to determine whether information is confidential include:

  • security codes and password protection of company information
  • labelling of information as confidential, and storage in a secure area or place
  • limiting employee remote access to trade secrets and confidential information to certain key employees
  • terms in employment agreements in respect of confidentiality
  • confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) with contractors

Now is a key time for companies to review and consider whether they currently have appropriate measures in place, and whether any in-place policies require revisions to address the challenges posed by remote work. It will also be prudent to consider updating or implementing policies concerning remote work, including:

  • ensuring that employees have access to secure electronic file storage
  • review or creation of a work-from-home policy that sets out or reiterates company policy in respect of confidential information, trade secrets and intellectual property generally
  • access requirements and permissions for certain employees or contractors
  • instructions on storing files and company records (i.e., not on unencrypted thumb drives or physical copies that are not secured)
  • utilizing systems that allow the monitoring of intellectual property, including tracking who has access to files and records, and whether information has been downloaded or transferred through other electronic means

In the event that a company or employer suspects that its trade secrets or confidential information have been improperly released or misused, it will be necessary to take swift action, including filing a Statement of Claim which seeks injunctive relief to prevent the use or further disclosure of the confidential information or trade secret.

Takeaway

The challenges facing companies in this new mass remote working environment may impact the security of confidential information. BLG has the experience and personnel to review any policies and company methods to ensure best practices, as well as effectively navigate the court system to enforce company rights in the event of a release or unauthorized use of intellectual property.

Related Articles

February 14, 2025

Cleaning Out the Closet: The Trademarks Opposition Board is Reviewing the Register

Michael Badejo
Section 45 of the Trademarks Act has generally provided a way for trademark registration applicants and opponents to remove “deadwood”—unused and abandoned trademarks that were on the trademark register. This process was generally reserved for parties to begin and oversee. In December 2024, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) advised of a pilot project which would see TMOB initiate section 45 proceedings. The effect? TMOB can clear the register of deadwood without waiting for applicants or opponents to initiate the process. Michael Badejo, Lawyer at Fillmore Riley LLP, walks us through how these changes impact operating procedures, processes and directions for TMOB. 
TopicsTrademarks
January 24, 2025

Practical implications of the Federal Court’s definition of “forced” divisional patent applications in NCS Multistage

Émilie Fleury
In NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation, 2023 FC 1486, the Federal Court revisited the question of what constitutes a “forced” divisional patent application—an important distinction given that forced divisionals enjoy immunity from double patenting allegations. This Emilie-Anne Fleury explores how the Court assessed whether certain divisional patents were truly “forced,” clarifies how voluntary versus forced divisions are treated under Canadian patent law, and highlights the practical considerations for patent applicants navigating unity of invention objections.
TopicsPatents
January 17, 2025

Unveiling the Canvas: Tackling the Issue of Counterfeit Indigenous Art in Canada

Melissa Tarsitano, AFSHAAN JIWAJI KAPASI
Art has always been a profound expression of culture, history, and identity. In Canada, Indigenous art stands as a vibrant testament to the rich heritage and diverse traditions of Indigenous peoples. However, amidst the celebration of this cultural wealth, a troubling issue looms large – the prevalence of counterfeit Indigenous art. Afshaan Jiwaji Kapasi & Melissa Tarsitano explore the complexities of counterfeit Indigenous art and offer opportunities to safeguard and authentically celebrate Indigenous art.
TopicsAnti-Counterfeiting Committee Indigenous

MISSION

Our mission is to enhance our members’ expertise as trusted intellectual property advisors, and to shape a policy and business environment that encourages the development, use, and value of intellectual property.


VISION

Our vision is for IPIC to be the leading authority on intellectual property in Canada, and the voice of intellectual property professionals.

LATEST TWEETS

Twitter feed is currently not available

CONTACT US

360 Albert Street, Suite 550
Ottawa, ON K1R 7X7

T 613-234-0516
E admin@ipic.ca

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The IPIC office is located in Ottawa, on the traditional, unceded territories of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.

©2021 Intellectual Property Institute of Canada, Ottawa, ON
Designed by Ottawa Web Design driven by Member Management Software