• About us
    Who We AreStaff DirectoryBoard of DirectorsHall of FameMember AwardsStrategic Plan / Annual ReportsCommittees/CommunitiesCode of EthicsEducational FoundationEquity, Diversity & Inclusion
  • Advocacy
    IP IncentivesIPIC SubmissionsIPIC Intervention Policy
  • What is IP?
     IP BasicsOwn it. CampaignWhy Use a ProfessionalHow to Become an AgentIndigenous Traditional Knowledge
  • Education
    Certification ProgramsCourses & EventsMentorship Program
  • Resources
    COVID-19 UpdatesNewsCIPRFind an IP ProfessionalIPIC Job Bank2019 Compensation StudyMedia KitIP Assist
  • Membership
    Your profession. Our purpose.Join NowMember BenefitsMember CategoriesMember Referral ProgramInsurance Program: IP Agent Insurance
  • 0
  • FR
David Ruston
Marks & Clerk Canada | Marks & Clerk Law LLP
,
Amrita V. Singh
Marks & Clerk Canada | Marks & Clerk Law LLP
,
Simmi Mangat
Marks & Clerk Canada | Marks & Clerk Law LLP
Topics
Share

Navigating your Global Patent Prosecution Strategy under Canada’s new Patent Rules

Published on October 27, 2020

The Backstory

The new Canadian Patent Rules came into effect on October 30, 2019 with the intent to make Canada compliant with its international treaty obligations by harmonizing and streamlining the administrative procedures for patents and patent applications. The changes to the Rules have resulted in both patent prosecutors and intellectual property owners adapting and developing new prosecution strategies.

Because patentees often want to align their Canadian patent applications with their global patent prosecution strategy, notably applications in other larger jurisdictions, such as Europe and the United States, Canadian applications are sometimes deliberately delayed to ensure consistency with corresponding international counterparts. Below is a brief discussion of how delays may be maximized under the new Rules.[1]

Delaying Requests for Examination

In Canadian patent prosecution, patent applicants must expressly request examination of an application within four years of the filing date. If that deadline is missed, the Patent Office will issue a notice requiring that examination be requested within two months from the date of that notice (along with payment of the applicable fees). The Patent Office will usually issue the notice within two months of the missed examination request deadline.

If the notice deadline is missed, the application is deemed abandoned. However, despite that deemed abandonment, the application may be reinstated within 12 months of the date the application was deemed abandoned.

But beware; under the new Rules, if reinstatement occurs after six months from the missed examination request deadline, the applicant will be required to provide reasons for its failure to file the request and provide evidence of due care. In addition, third party actions that would otherwise infringe the applicant’s rights will be without penalty, until the application is reinstated. This may have serious consequences for a patentee’s ability to enforce its rights, and it is important for applicants to recognize that this third party carve-out comes into effect regardless of when the above-mentioned notice was sent.

Delaying requests for examination through abandonment can allow applicants to wait for prosecution to advance in other jurisdictions, bearing in mind the longer they wait the higher the bar becomes to getting the applications reinstated, and the greater the risk of third parties gaining rights as a result of the delay. Careful diarizing of dates is fundamental to this strategy.

Delaying Responses to the Examiner

Once examination has been requested and an Office Action has been received, prosecution may still be delayed. Applicants have four months to respond to the Office Action, with an additional extension of two months available with a simple justification (e.g., we need more time to prepare a response). The request for the extension must be made before the response deadline.

If no response is submitted by the deadline (even after the two-month extension is granted), the application will be deemed abandoned. Again, the application may be reinstated within 12 months of the abandonment date. Unlike a delayed examination request however, there is no requirement to show due care.

Taking this approach allows an applicant to delay prosecution up to 14 months from the original Office Action response deadline.

But beware; as file wrapper estoppel is now a part of Canadian patent law and may be applicable in patent litigation, applicants should be cautious in how they respond to Office Actions, and how they amend Canadian applications in view of foreign ones.

Delaying after Allowance

If and when a Patent Office Examiner concludes an application complies with the Patent Act and Rules, they will issue a notice of allowance. Once the notice has issued, only amendments to correct obvious errors are permitted. However, a request within four months of receipt of the notice to withdraw it (along with payment of the applicable fee), will re-open prosecution and return the application to examination allowing further amendments to be made. Once back in prosecution, the timing of examination may be further extended.

If a request to withdraw the notice is not submitted, and the final fee is not paid within the four-month period, the application is deemed abandoned. It may reinstated as of right with payment of the final fee, but reinstatement will not re-open prosecution.

But beware; like Pandora’s box, if the application is re-opened to examination, there is a risk of unpleasant consequences (e.g., new art may be raised by the Examiner).

The Takeaway

As described above, an application may be deliberately (or because of unforeseen circumstances) delayed during prosecution in multiple ways.

The COVID-19 pandemic is an unforeseen circumstance that has caused patent offices around the world, including the Canadian Patent Office, to shut down rather abruptly with lockdowns, and while they are slowly beginning to ramp back up to full operation, the resulting delays (and several rounds of designated days granted by the Canadian Patent Office to afford applicants more time to address prosecution – mindful of physical and economic limitations caused by the pandemic) mean that correspondence with the patent offices is delayed. Needless to say, in Canada these delays impact requests for examination, responses to Office Actions, and re-opening prosecution of applications after notices of allowance are issued.

It is important to discuss the above strategies and corresponding considerations with your patent agent to make sure you understand the implications for your patent application(s) and intellectual property rights

[1] Except where indicated, the strategies above apply to both national phase entries and applications directly filed in Canada.

*This article was originally published on Marks & Clerk's website: https://www.marks-clerk.com/Home/Knowledge-News/Articles/Navigating-your-Global-Patent-Prosecution-Strategy.aspx#.X5h31ohKi71 

*Article disponible en anglais seulement.

Related Articles

May 12, 2023

Tips and Tricks for Effective Virtual Advocacy

Ryan Wong
As a junior IP litigator, I find myself having a lot of questions about what it means to be an effective advocate in these “modern” times. I am among the first cohort of students to cut my teeth as a 2L summer and articling student wholly during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, my legal experience has been one of constant adjustments. I’ve witnessed our profession’s incredible ability to adapt and react to unprecedented times.
TopicsEmerging Leaders Committee
May 5, 2023

Practice Tips for Emerging IP Practitioners Looking to Work In-House

Anastassia Trifonova
Today's emerging IP practitioners have a wide range of career options. While IP work was traditionally handled exclusively by law firms, more and more businesses are now seeking IP specialists to complement their in-house legal teams. As organizations strive to optimize their internal legal resources, IP lawyers and agents alike can bring valuable expertise to the table. This article aims to provides helpful tips for IP professionals who are looking to succeed in-house.
TopicsEmerging Leaders Committee
April 24, 2023

Join IPIC & its Educational Foundation in recognizing World IP Day 2023 on April 26th

Kevin Shipley, Nicole Mantini
The theme of this year’s World IP Day is an important reminder that many segments of Canadian society do not have equal access to the necessary resources and tools to thrive in our profession. IPIC has been focused on raising awareness and working to make meaningful, positive change in respect of these issues. Since 2019, IPIC's Educational Foundation’s [Patent & Trademark Institute Educational Foundation (PTIEF)] mandate has been to encourage education and scholarship in the IP field with a focus on promoting diversity and inclusion among IP professionals and removing barriers to access for members of under-represented groups interested in pursuing educational opportunities in the IP field.
TopicsFoundation Committee EDI Educational Foundation

MISSION

Our mission is to enhance our members’ expertise as trusted intellectual property advisors, and to shape a policy and business environment that encourages the development, use, and value of intellectual property.


VISION

Our vision is for IPIC to be the leading authority on intellectual property in Canada, and the voice of intellectual property professionals.

LATEST TWEETS

Twitter feed is currently not available

CONTACT US

360 Albert Street, Suite 550
Ottawa, ON K1R 7X7

T 613-234-0516
E admin@ipic.ca

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The IPIC office is located in Ottawa, on the traditional, unceded territories of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.

©2021 Intellectual Property Institute of Canada, Ottawa, ON
Designed by Ottawa Web Design driven by Member Management Software