• About us
    Who We AreStaff DirectoryBoard of DirectorsHall of FameMember AwardsStrategic Plan / Annual ReportsCommittees/CommunitiesCode of EthicsEducational FoundationEquity, Diversity & Inclusion
  • Advocacy
    IPIC SubmissionsIPIC Intervention Policy
  • What is IP?
     IP BasicsOwn it. CampaignWhy Use a ProfessionalHow to Become an AgentIndigenous Traditional Knowledge
  • Education
    Certification ProgramsCourses & EventsCertified Canadian Patent & Trademark Administrator Search Tool
  • Resources
    NewsCIPRFind an IP ProfessionalIPIC Job BankIPIC Compensation SurveysMedia KitIP Assist
  • Membership
    Your profession. Our purpose.Join NowMember BenefitsMember CategoriesMember Referral ProgramInsurance Program: IP Agent Insurance
  • 0
  • FR
Taiji Yoshino
Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP
TopicsPatents Patent Committee
Share

Introduction of Japan’s IP Conciliation Proceedings

Published on May 27, 2022

IP Conciliation Proceeding is a tool available in Japan, aiming to resolve an IP dispute between parties in a speedy manner based on the proposition that parties have agreed to bring their dispute through IP Conciliation and have engaged in negotiation prior to the proceeding. IP Conciliation Proceeding is different from litigation and provisional disposition.

Initially this proceeding was introduced at the Osaka District Court in 1999. From October 1, 2019, the 21st and 26th Civil Divisions of the Osaka District Court and 29th, 40th, 46th and 47th Civil Divisions of the Tokyo District Court (divisions specialized in IP cases) started operating a renewed IP Conciliation Proceedings with a new framework.

Under the new framework, a conciliation committee conducts an IP Conciliation Proceeding. The conciliation committee consists of a judge (who hears IP cases regularly), and two experts / conciliation commissioners (lawyers and patent attorneys with vast experiences in dealing with IP disputes).

IP Conciliation Proceeding has the following characteristics / advantages:

A. Flexibility:

  1. The parties may choose the key issues for the proceeding.
  2. The parties may go back and negotiate outside the proceeding (out-of-court negotiations).
  3. Any party may choose to litigate or file a petition for provisional disposition, instead.

B. Speedy:

  1. The proceeding will move expeditiously since the parties would have agreed on various matters when submitting the petition, submission of all the relevant document and evidence is also required before the First Date of the proceeding (about 6 weeks after filing of the petition. Please see below), plus the conciliation committee is required to render its opinion (verbally) by the Third Date of the proceeding (about 3 weeks to 1.5 months after the second date for proceeding. The second date of proceeding is about 3 weeks to 1.5 months after the first date of the proceeding. Please see below).

C. Expertness

  1. The conciliation committee members are specialized in IP dispute resolutions.

D. Confidentiality (closed to the public)

  1. Forms and evidence submitted during the proceeding are not open to the public inspection and confidential.

 There are four major steps in the proceeding.

  • Step 1. The parties will need to reach an agreement on jurisdiction, designating either the Tokyo District Court or the Osaka District Court. One of the parties, the petitioner, files a petition for IP Conciliation with points of disputes, an agreement on jurisdiction, documentary evidences and other supporting documents; the respondent submits a written answer, documentary evidences and other supporting documents 10 days before the First Date of the proceeding.
  • Step 2. The First Date (about 6 weeks after the filing of the petition), where the court confirms the issues, and, if the issues are simple, the IP conciliation committee may provide its opinion or suggest a direction of a possible solution. The committee may instruct parties to submit supplementary allegations / evidence therefor, if necessary.
  • Step 3. The Second Date (about 3 weeks to 1.5 months from the First Date), where the committee considers the supplementary allegation and its evidence, if any, and a conciliation proposal, and may present its opinion or suggestion on the direction of a possible solution.
  • Step 4. The Third Date (about 3 weeks to 1.5 months from the Second Date), where the committee verbally presents its opinion to the parties by this date, regarding the committee’s determination on the issues.

Considering these characteristics of the proceedings, cases suitable therefor may be disputes arise during

Conclusion:

IP Conciliation Proceeding is a speedy and flexible tool for settling some of IP disputes in Japan. According to Japan Patent Attorneys Association (or JPAA), 78% of the cases were successfully conciliated during the last two years since the start of this IP Conciliation Proceeding, and average duration therefor was 5 months.  For more information, please refer to the following links: 

  1. Tokyo District Court – Guide to IP Conciliation Proceedings: Guide_to_IP_Conciliation_Proceedings.pdf  (courts.go.jp)
  2. Osaka District Court – Guidelines for IP Conciliation Proceedings at the Osaka District Court: https://www.ip.courts.go.jp/eng/vc-files/eng/file/Guide_to_IP_Conciliation_Proceedings.pdf
  3. Osaka District Court - Explanation of the New IP Conciliation at the Osaka District Court: Explanation_of_the_New_IP_Conciliation_at_the_Osaka_District_Court.pdf (courts.go.jp)

 

Related Articles

January 24, 2025

Practical implications of the Federal Court’s definition of “forced” divisional patent applications in NCS Multistage

Émilie Fleury
In NCS Multistage Inc. v. Kobold Corporation, 2023 FC 1486, the Federal Court revisited the question of what constitutes a “forced” divisional patent application—an important distinction given that forced divisionals enjoy immunity from double patenting allegations. This Emilie-Anne Fleury explores how the Court assessed whether certain divisional patents were truly “forced,” clarifies how voluntary versus forced divisions are treated under Canadian patent law, and highlights the practical considerations for patent applicants navigating unity of invention objections.
TopicsPatents
December 13, 2024

The importance of checking your citations – the non-case of Hennes & Mauritz AB v M & S Meat Shops Inc, 2012 TMOB 7; or am I seeing things?

Tamara Winegust
If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it. Twice in the past four months, the Trademark Opposition Board has identified instances where an applicant’s agent has cited cases that do not exist as part of arguments filed to request an interlocutory ruling under section 38(6) of the Trademarks Act to strike all or part of an opposition statement. The suspected culprit behind these false citations —generative artificial intelligence. Learn how these incidents unfolded and what legal professionals must do to avoid similar mistakes.
TopicsPatents Trademarks
December 6, 2024

Beware of Trademark and Patent Scams: Protect Your Intellectual Property

Heather Boyd
Scams targeting trademark and patent owners are on the rise, with fraudsters employing fear tactics and impersonation to trick unsuspecting individuals and businesses. It’s essential to stay vigilant and informed to avoid falling victim to these schemes. Heather Boyd, Principal and Trademark Agent at Pillar IP, outlines common warning signs, steps to safeguard yourself, and resources to combat these scams.
TopicsPatents Trademarks

MISSION

Our mission is to enhance our members’ expertise as trusted intellectual property advisors, and to shape a policy and business environment that encourages the development, use, and value of intellectual property.


VISION

Our vision is for IPIC to be the leading authority on intellectual property in Canada, and the voice of intellectual property professionals.

LATEST TWEETS

Twitter feed is currently not available

CONTACT US

360 Albert Street, Suite 550
Ottawa, ON K1R 7X7

T 613-234-0516
E admin@ipic.ca

LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The IPIC office is located in Ottawa, on the traditional, unceded territories of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people.

©2021 Intellectual Property Institute of Canada, Ottawa, ON
Designed by Ottawa Web Design driven by Member Management Software