Found 1 match for your search
August 23, 2024
Boehringer v JAMP continued: Federal Court revisits the test for whether a claim element is essential or non-essential.
In the recent case of Boehringer v JAMP, 2024 FC 1198, the Federal Court revisited the essential versus non-essential claim element test. Devin Doyle walks us through this pivotal case, centered around the patents for nintedanib capsules, explored whether the presence of lecithin in the formulation was a non-essential element. The Court’s decision provides significant insights into claim construction, emphasizing the importance of carefully interpreting patent language to determine the essentiality of claim elements.